Posted: 13.04.21 at 11:29 by Martin Shaw
The news this week that Seaton Community Hospital is on a list of sites that could be developed - producing 14 new houses - does not mean that closure is imminent. Planning officers were compiling a list of possible sites and there is currently no specific proposal.
However, the list is a salutory reminder that the hospital’s future is not safe. Indeed, the papers note that "NHS property services have submitted the community hospital and have advised that there may be potential to make more effective use of the site, subject to health commissioning requirements".
NHS Property Services is the legal owner of the hospital, a company which the Government set up to maximise use of and revenue from NHS assets.
NHS PS actually specified that "approximately 50 per cent of the site may be released", and the site was considered by planners "on the basis that there would be no loss of health services resulting from any such reconfiguration".
In fact, a big "loss of health services" has already happened, in 2017, when the beds were closed after the last-minute, never-properly-explained decision to save the beds in Sidmouth instead. The hospital was 38 per cent empty until Covid vaccinations began in December.
So what they’re talking about is a further loss of services - all the clinics and the physiotherapy suite which still continue in the hospital. And what they probably mean is that services would continue - just not in Seaton Hospital. Local people would probably have to get in their cars and drive to Sidmouth, or Axminster, or Exeter, or wherever clinics were still carried on.
Fine, you might think - except that one Seaton household in every six doesn’t have a car. And many of the people who most need health care are the people who don’t have access to one - the elderly and infirm (especially women), and mothers with young children. Forty three per cent of Seaton’s population are now over 65 - the same as in Sidmouth and Budleigh Salterton. We are one of the most elderly communities in England.
How on earth could NHS planners think that this town can afford to lose its hospital? The long reach of that fateful 2017 decision is apparent. Sidmouth Hospital was not put forward for development by NHS PS.
The COVID pandemic has shown that the NHS needs more - not fewer - beds, clinics, and above all nurses and doctors. In some parts of the country last year, people over 60 or 70 were just not sent to hospital where their lives could have been saved. In the next pandemic that could be us. All the more reason for the Seaton area community to rally again, to keep our hospital, which we paid for, for the future.
You can submit your own news straight to Seaton News by using the ‘Nub It’ button on our homepage. This can also be done for free for events on our What's On page and businesses, groups and organisations on our Local List page by using the ‘Nub It’ button.
This indoor arena extravaganza will be fun filled and full of music, lights and amazing dinosaurs with an educational twist, Featuring some of the mos...